Page url: http://40khobbyblog.blogspot.com/2021/04/praetorian-guard-wip.html

Show / Hide test details

Page Title: 40k Hobby Blog: Praetorian Guard WIP

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: A blog dedicated to model building and painting. It has evolved from 40k, and now encompasses 30k, historical, and scale model building. Thursday, April 1, 2021 Praetorian Guard WIP With the color scheme set, I soldiered forth with the rest of the army in a batch painting fashion. I'm very rusty, but I'm having a blast painting these guys. I thought the commissar was the commander, so I painted him up really un-commissary...er un-murder-deathy. Now the big question becomes whether I can accumulate enough to field these guys in an actual force. I think I can scrape together two infantry squads, a command squad, and maybe two weapon team squads. Is that enough? I have no idea how Guard work in 9th, or how an army is even put together. What I do know is that these guys need a single suitable FW ww1 styled tank to accompany them. Which variant should I pick? I guess the easy path is the pick the most WW1 looking tank possible. Posted by

  • This webpage has 165 words which is NOT between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Your header tags:

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 3 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: 40k

Possibly mis-spelt word: 30k

Possibly mis-spelt word: WIP

Suggestion: WEEP
Suggestion: QUIP
Suggestion: WIPE
Suggestion: WISP
Suggestion: WIMP
Suggestion: WHIP
Suggestion: SIP
Suggestion: WIN
Suggestion: NIP
Suggestion: RIP
Suggestion: WIT
Suggestion: TIP
Suggestion: LIP
Suggestion: DIP
Suggestion: WIG

Broken links:

  • This webpage has 5 broken links.

Broken link URL:

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • It appears that this page was updated on the Sunday, April 17, 2022 which is within the last thirty days - this is a GOOD thing!

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears to be mobile friendly - this is a GOOD thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!