Page Title: How to Cite the SEP (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: SEPIA for Libraries How to Cite the SEP To cite the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, we recommend the following bibliographic format, which you may need to adapt to meet the style requirements of the publication for which you are writing. Typically, users read the current ‘active’ version of each entry. This is the version you reach directly from our main Table of Contents. However, because Encyclopedia entries are subject to periodic revision, it is more appropriate to cite one of the ‘archived’ versions of the entry. When you quote from an entry, it is particularly important to cite an archived version, for otherwise the passage you cite might disappear from the active version of the entry. Be sure to verify that the passage you are quoting matches what is in the archived version. For some scholarly purposes, it might be important to cite the earliest version in our Archives that matches the current version. But any archived SEP entry is citable. If the material you wish to cite has not been archived (because the entry is new or has been recently modified), you should, if possible, wait for the next archived version of the Encyclopedia. Fixed editions of the Encyclopedia are created and archived every three months, on the 21st of September, December, March, and June. To make the citation process easier, each entry has an “Author and Citation Info” link in the box of menu items located at the top left corner of the entry. This takes you to a page with specific citation information for that entry. For example, the citation information page for Jeff Malpas' entry on Donald Davidson will show you a citation of the following form: Malpas, J., “Donald Davidson”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . Note that the above URL ends in the name “davidson” followed by a slash “/”. “davidson” is the name of the directory which contains the entry. The filename of the entry itself is “index.html” (indeed, all the entries in the Encyclopedia are named “index.html”). However, you need not include the entry filename at the end of the URL. By default, our web server will send the file “index.html” when a web browser requests a URL such as the one displayed above. Again, the above citation is only an example. To get the current citation information for the Donald Davidson entry or any other entry, please go to the entry and click on the “Author and Citation Info” link in the menu list located in the box at the top left corner of each entry. If you require other kinds of bibliographic information, you may find the following facts helpful. Title: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Principal Editor: Edward N. Zalta World Wide Web URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/ Publisher:

  • This webpage has 480 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Your header tags:

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has no spelling errors that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has 1 images that do not have their width and height specified.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears to be mobile friendly - this is a GOOD thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!