Page Title: Dissertation — I am Beck Tench

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: Abstract We live in an attention economy where human attention is harvested, commoditized, and traded as a scarce and valuable resource. Information and communication technologies (ICT) use an evolving branch of psychological research called behavior design to manipulate our attention and behavior. Consequences of this affect what we do with our time and also our capacity for reflection and self-awareness, which has lasting effects across our life and relationships. This dissertation looks to attention restoration theory (ART) and participatory design (PD) for help in addressing the harms created by the attention economy. ART is an empirically validated theory that addresses how attention can be depleted and also restored. PD gives us an experiential and democratic framing for helping people have a say in the technology that affects their lives. Using PD to co-design restorative environments may help us restore and protect our attention on both individual and collective levels. The work of this dissertation uses PD, visual elicitation, phenomenological interviews, and focus groups to explore (1) how the design process itself might be restorative, (2) how co-designers' behaviors with ICTs change in the process of designing for others, and (3) how institutions might play a systemic, scalable role in protecting our attention. Doing this will involve analyzing data collected in two undergraduate design classes that used PD to design restorative environments on the University of Washington’s campus, and translating that curriculum to a relevant and feasible offering for libraries for and with library practitioners. Proposal Presentation I presented (and passed!) this proposal on Jun 25, 2020 to an audience of Zoom attendees and my supervisory committee: David Levy , Dave Hendry , Cheryl Metoyer , and Jennifer Turns . You can watch a pre-recorded version of that presentation in the Youtube video below. As I mention in the video, I welcome your comments or questions at tench@uw.edu . Bibliography The following is a curated version of my dissertation proposal bibliography. Download all referenced citations here. The Attention Economy Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2001). The Attention economy. Ubiquity, 2001(May), 1-es. Eyal, N. (2014). Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products. Portfolio. Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. Appleton-Century-Crofts. Fogg, B. J. (2002). Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do (Interactive Technologies). Morgan Kaufmann. Freed, R. (2018). The Tech Industry’s Psychological War on Kids – Richard Freed – Medium. [2019/1/24]. Retrieved 2020-05-18 from Medium . Nelson-Field, K. (2020). The Attention Economy and How Media Works : Simple Truths for Marketers. Palgrave Macmillan US. Odell, J. (2019). How to Do Nothing: Resisting the Attention Economy. Melville House. Simon, H., & Greenberger, M. (1971). Computers, communications and the public interest. Computers, communications, and the public interest. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 40-41. Vallor, S. (2016). Technology and the Virtues: A Philosophical Guide to a Future Worth Wanting. Oxford University Press. Williams, J. (2018). Stand Out of Our Light: Freedom and Resistance in the Attention Economy. Cambridge University Press. Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books. Attention Restoration Theory Hartig, T. (2004). Restorative environments. Encyclopedia of applied psychology, 3, 273-279. Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences. Environmental Behavior, 23(1), 3-26. Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. CUP Archive. Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(3), 169-182. Kaplan, S. (2001). Meditation, Restoration, and the Management of Mental Fatigue. Environmental Behavior, 33(4), 480-506. Kaplan, S., & Berman, M. G. (2010). Directed Attention as a Common Resource for Executive Functioning and Self Regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science , 5(1), 43-57. Ohly, H., White, M. P., Wheeler, B. W., Bethel, A., Ukoumunne, O. C., Nikolaou, V., & Garside, R. (2016). Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review of the attention restoration potential of exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health., 19(7), 305-343. Stevenson, M. P., Schilhab, T., & Bentsen, P. (2018). Attention Restoration Theory II: a systematic review to clarify attention processes affected by exposure to natural environments. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health., 1-42. Contemplative Studies Barbezat, D. P., & Bush, M. (2013). Contemplative Practices in Higher Education: Powerful Methods to Transform Teaching and Learning. Wiley. Duerr, M. (2004). A Powerful Silence The Role of Meditation and Other Contemplative Practices In American Life and Work., 159. Duerr, M., & Bergman, C. (2011). The Tree of Contemplative Practices. [2019/2/18] Retrieved from contemplativemind.org . Kabat-Zinn, J. (2009). Wherever You Go, There You Are: Mindfulness Meditation In Everyday Life. Hachette Books. Komjathy, L. (2017). Introducing Contemplative Studies. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Levy, D. M. (2016). Mindful Tech: How to Bring Balance to Our Digital Lives. Yale University Press. Merton, T. (1965). Love and Living. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Participatory Design Bødker, S., & Kyng, M. (2018). Participatory Design That Matters Facing the Big Issues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(1), 4:1-4:31. Kaner, S. (2014). Facilitator’s guide to participatory decision making. John Wiley & Sons. Mages, M. A., & Onafuwa, D. (2019). Opacity, Transition, and Design Research. Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios en Diseño y Comunicación No73, 19, 264-282. Muller, M. J. (2009). Participatory Design: The Third Space in HCI. In (pp. 181-202). CRC Press. Spinuzzi, C. (2005). The methodology of participatory design. Technical communication. Spinuzzi, C. (2002). A Scandinavian challenge, a US response. In. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. Methods Alase, A. (2017). The Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): A Guide to a Good Qualitative Research Approach. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 5(2), 9 19. Band-Winterstein, T., Doron, I., & Naim, S. (2014). ‘I take them with me’–reflexivity in sensitive research. Reflective Practice, 15(4), 530-539. Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation. Qual. Health Res., 26(13), 1802-1811. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology. Carlson, J. A. (2010). Avoiding traps in member checking. Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1102-1113. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130. Krueger, R. A. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research. Sage publications. Meyer, K., & Willis, R. (2019). Looking Back to Move Forward: The Value of Reflexive Journaling for Novice Researchers. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 62(5), 578-585. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. Teachers college press. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. London: Sage. SAGE Publications Ltd.

  • This webpage has 1016 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 4 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: Hachette

Suggestion: Machete
Suggestion: Hatchet
Suggestion: Cachet
Suggestion: Attache

Possibly mis-spelt word: Palgrave

Suggestion: Pal grave
Suggestion: Pal-grave
Suggestion: Palaver

Possibly mis-spelt word: Abstract

Suggestion: Abstract
Suggestion: Abstracts
Suggestion: Abs tract
Suggestion: Abs-tract

Possibly mis-spelt word: Komjathy

Suggestion: Homeopathy

Broken links:

  • This webpage has 10 broken links.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears NOT to be mobile friendly - this is NOT a good thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!