Page Title: By Ken Levine: "Kenny's Choice"

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: Tuesday, April 12, 2022 "Kenny's Choice" Here’s a Friday Question stemming from my recent Weekend Post that became an entire post. It’s from Daniel: You included Cheers in your dream lineup, but said you'd have to find a way to squeeze Frasier into it. I know this is nitpicking since you obviously love both shows, but do you consider Cheers to be the better of the two series? Even if only slightly? And, if so, why? I loved them both when they originally aired, but I think Frasier has aged much better than Cheers. Not that there's anything wrong with Cheers (I still like it), but Frasier has a structural precision to most of its episodes that continues to be astounding. Every script is like an exquisitely made Swiss watch. (I feel okay saying this since you wrote for both series) Well, first of all it’s a very hard "Sophie's" choice.  Besides the very unique “Point of View” episode of MASH that we wrote, if I had to choose one single episode as our very best I would choose “Room Service” from FRASIER.  If I had to choose the best episode I ever directed, it would be “Roz and the Schnoz” from FRASIER.  So my pride on being associated with that show is enormous. Where CHEERS has the edge for me is more personal and emotional.  I was with CHEERS from the pilot and stayed with the show for nine years.  I was with FRASIER on and off for six. That first season of CHEERS was really a bonding experience.  Everyone involved was all around the same age and even though our ratings were terrible we all felt we were part of something special. David Isaacs and I had just come from three years of development hell and the chance to go back on a show of this quality was like someone throwing us a lifesaver. There were not a lot of great sitcoms at that point in time.  In fact, there was lots of speculation that sitcoms were dead and soon to become extinct.  Established sitcom writers were scrambling and writing one hour light drama specs.   Most of the sitcoms that were on the air then were not very good.  So to get on a show I really loved was a godsend. I remember one rewrite night sitting in the room with Glen & Les Charles, my partner, and the great David Lloyd and thinking, “Wow.  Just how lucky am I?” We loved working with the Charles Brothers and Jim Burrows and believe me, it was an absolute masterclass in showrunning. I also really enjoyed the setting.  As a huge sports fan, a sports bar was right up my alley.  I loved writing a romantic relationship and could certainly identify with the barflies. I loved all the characters.  We wrote 40 episodes of CHEERS and never got tired of it.  Trust me, that’s rare.  We could always find new ways for the characters to surprise us. And if I’m being honest, I always wanted to win an Emmy and CHEERS allowed me to achieve that. So although CHEERS and FRASIER are both exceptional shows (and how lucky am I to have worked on both?), I would have to give the slight nod to CHEERS.   Also, I get more residuals from CHEERS. By

  • This webpage has 536 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 1 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: Roz

Suggestion: Ross
Suggestion: Oz
Suggestion: Ron
Suggestion: Rod
Suggestion: Doz
Suggestion: Rom
Suggestion: Rob
Suggestion: Roy
Suggestion: R oz
Suggestion: Roe
Suggestion: Rot
Suggestion: Row

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • It appears that this page was updated on the Sunday, April 17, 2022 which is within the last thirty days - this is a GOOD thing!

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears to be mobile friendly - this is a GOOD thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!