Page Title: What happened when I tried to claim I was 146 years old on Instagram.

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description: People who work at these companies weren’t born yesterday; they know users lie about their age.

  • This webpage makes use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: Comment One night last week, I opened Instagram, expecting to scroll through my usual feed of French bulldogs, Selling Sunset cast selfies, and Reels I don’t want to watch. But instead, a prompt popped up on my screen: “Add your birthday,” it said. Below were scrollable fields to select your birthdate, month, and year. I tried to tap out of the prompt, to no avail; I even closed the app and reopened it, but the prompt remained. I did not want to tell Instagram my birthday. Plus, the platform’s parent company, Meta, already has that information; for years, I had my birthday on my Facebook profile. Looking for any way out, I clicked a link in the prompt that read: “Why do I need to do this?” Instagram’s help page explained that it wanted to verify that users were over 13, the minimum age to have an Instagram account in most countries. OK, then, I thought. I am definitely over 13, and as long as I pick a birth date before April 2009, I should be good. With a flick of my index finger, I scrolled backward through the field to select a year; it landed on a year a solid decade before I was born, so I impatiently flicked again, more forcefully this time, and discovered the field had scrolled all the way back to the 1930s. Intrigued, I kept flicking and landed on 1876. Sure, why not? 1876 it is. I clicked “save.” Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Another prompt appeared. “Are you 146 years old?” it asked. The two options were “go back” and “yes.” Feeling combative, I clicked yes. How would Instagram know? But of course it knew. No one, to our knowledge, has ever lived to 146; the oldest known person was only (“only”) 122, and some claim she might have been lying about her advanced age . My lie resulted in an immediate blocking, and shunted me to an Instagram page called “Help Us Verify Your Age.” My account would only be reinstated if I filled out a form, which required me to submit my full name, and a photo of a “ valid ID ” that includes my face and name of birth. “You must be 13 years old to have an Instagram account,” the form said. “We disabled your account because you are not old enough yet.” But lo! I was banned for being too old! Instagram has been clear that 13 is the minimum age to have an account, but does the platform’s system have a maximum age? If I’d reported I was, say, 105 instead, would that have triggered Instagram’s systems to require me to upload my ID? Advertisement Advertisement I reached out to Instagram to ask if Instagram’s systems identify accounts that seem suspiciously old. “We do have a maximum age,” an Instagram communications rep told me, but would not discuss further details about that max on-record. This makes sense; the platform likely doesn’t want people knowing how to circumvent its systems. Twitter and TikTok also have minimum age requirements for users, but have not publicly stated whether they have age maximums; I reached out to both companies for comment, but never received a reply. Advertisement But I wanted to know more, so to find out, I tried to make a new account. When prompted to enter my birthdate, Instagram’s scrollable field for birth year only went back to 1919—my original selection, 1876, wasn’t even an option. Even after entering all my info into the iPhone app, I was unable to make a new account; Instagram gave me a generic error message after each attempt. Instead, I tried using my laptop, and my attempt to create a new account was blocked, saying my IP address had been flagged as an “open proxy”—an address people are using to make abusive accounts. (Perhaps my initial declaration of being 146 triggered this.) But with the help of a virtual private network, I was able to make a new account with a birthdate that would’ve made me 100 years and 1 day old. Advertisement Advertisement Advertisement Instagram isn’t the only social app asking users about their age. A 1998 law, meant to protect privacy of young children, prevents platforms from collecting marketing and tracking data from users under 13. As a result, social media sites have set the minimum age for accounts at 13, and platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and TikTok have also taken to asking users for age verification as well. For those, I typically use a more believable fake birthdate—April 20, 1969—and haven’t yet had a problem. (The subject of my next investigation: How many people use April 20, 1969, as a fake birthday?) Advertisement

  • This webpage has 765 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 1 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: scrollable

Suggestion: scroll able
Suggestion: scroll-able
Suggestion: Scrabble
Suggestion: scrabble

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears NOT to be mobile friendly - this is NOT a good thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!