Page Title: Paris, 13th District movie review (2022) | Roger Ebert

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description: Audiard is invigorated by these vibrant, gorgeous young people, delivering one of the most sexually active films in years, even for the French.

  • This webpage makes use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: Powered by JustWatch Jacques Audiard , a director who typically makes “Very Serious Dramas” like “ A Prophet ” and “ Dheepan ,” switches gears for a playful, sexy study of young lives in the city of lights in the charming “Paris, 13th District.” It sounds cheesy to say that Audiard’s film, based on the novels by Adrian Tomine and co-written by the wonderful Celine Sciamma (“Petite Maman,” “ Portrait of a Lady on Fire ”) is about “how people connect in the modern era” but that’s certainly a big part of it. It’s not coincidental that relationships form in this film through misunderstandings. Two people’s lives are changed when a woman looking for a roommate thinks that Camille can only be a woman’s name; another character’s life is upended when she is mistakenly identified as a cam girl. We are constantly getting each other wrong nowadays, aren't we? People hook up and pull apart again in Audiard's film, thinking that the casual sex is just another random part of their day, but each of these relationships impact the way that one bounces to the next. Audiard can sometimes lose the overall thread here, but his skill with performers holds the project together, and it’s interesting to see a movie about sexually active young people that doesn’t judge them, but tries to understand their hopes and dreams, even the ones they know aren’t going to last longer than the next fling. Advertisement Known as “Les Olympiades” in France, Audiard’s film takes place in the Olympiades high rises, a community of buildings the director loves to frame in his gorgeous black and white—the idea being that we are merely glimpsing a handful of stories in this part of Paris, and every one of those lit windows could hold its own. He starts with a naked Émilie ( Lucie Zhang ), laying on a couch at night doing karaoke, filling the time of being a young woman on her own. The story really starts when Émilie puts out an ad for a new roommate and a young teacher named Camille ( Makita Samba ) responds. She rebuffs him at first, presuming Camille was a woman merely by his name, but the sexual tension is immediate, and she gives in. They’re fooling around before he’s even moved in. Of course, being a roommate and a lover comes with inherent problems, especially when it’s clear that Émilie takes the whole thing a bit more seriously than Camille. Perhaps by virtue of combining multiple Tomine stories into one script, “Paris, 13th District” almost feels like it’s going to be a true episodic anthology after Émilie & Camille’s story gives way to the introduction of Nora (the phenomenal Noémie Merlant ), a student who finds herself in a social nightmare when she’s mistaken for a cam girl named Amber Sweet ( Jehnny Beth ). Her classmates hurl sexually abusive insults at Nora, and the young woman decides to actually contact Amber to discuss the problem, leading to a unique relationship. Of course, Nora will also cross paths with Camille. It’s that kind of movie. Audiard is invigorated by these vibrant, gorgeous young people, delivering one of the most sexually active films in years, even for the French. And his cast fearlessly work through their characters most private moments and emotions, leading to a movie that isn't voyeuristic as much as it is genuine. All of his performers disappear into their roles, but the MVP is “Portrait of a Lady on Fire” star Merlant, who sells what could have been a broadly wacky subplot from a Garry Marshall rom-com in a way that's believable. She’s a fascinating performer, able to convey the multiple conflicting emotions that can arise in a relationship without feeling forced. Advertisement If anything holds Audiard back here, it’s that the whole venture becomes a bit banal. We’ve seen stories of young dating culture so many times before—there’s a whole wing of HBO built from the profit of shows with structures and stories like this one—that I struggled to find what drew Audiard to this particular tale. He sometimes seems like he wants to unleash a little more visual flair, whether it’s in split screen that reminds viewers this is based on graphic novels or a brief burst of unexpected color in one scene, but the film is ultimately a bit too formally and narratively reserved. Having said that, the raw, vulnerable performances transcend what could be framed as an overall lack of ambition on Audiard’s part. It's as if he fell in love with these characters, recognizing perhaps some of his youth in their successes and failures. It’s hard to blame him. Even if this kind of love is fleeting. In theaters today.

  • This webpage has 778 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 3 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: JustWatch

Suggestion: Just Watch
Suggestion: Just-watch
Suggestion: Wristwatch

Possibly mis-spelt word: Audiard

Suggestion: Auditor

Possibly mis-spelt word: Dheepan

Suggestion: Deadpan

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has 5 images that do not have their width and height specified.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears to be mobile friendly - this is a GOOD thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!