Page url: https://www.penciltalk.org/2021/10/mongol-trademark

Show / Hide test details

Page Title: Newell Brands cancel Mongol pencil trademark – pencil talk | pencil reviews and discussion

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: October 31, 2021 at 8:41 am The end of a venerable name in North American pencils. When I was a kid, and the Mongol was my family’s pencil of choice, I had no idea that “Mongol” was anything more than the name of a pencil. It just seemed like a cool, unusual name. October 31, 2021 at 9:45 am What a shame – even moreso given the Mirado was discontinued last year . Does that leave the Dixon Ticonderoga as the last ubiquitous classic American pencil in production? Musgrave and General still make pencils but as far as I can tell, they didn’t have the ubiquity the Mirado, Mongol, and Ticonderoga do/did. The Mongol was never sold here in the UK as far as I know. I don’t even know if Eberhard Faber had any market presence here. I’ve never seen one here organically across the five decades I’ve been using pencils; the pencil market mostly consisted of Staedtler, Faber-Castell, and Derwent. Leave a Reply Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked * Comment

  • This webpage has 172 words which is NOT between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Your header tags:

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has no spelling errors that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has 3 images that do not have their width and height specified.

Image link URL:

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears to be mobile friendly - this is a GOOD thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!