Page Title: The Stationer Work Book Review. — The Finer Point

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: Home Stationery Journaling Drawing Reading Contact The Stationer Work Book Review. The Stationer Work Book was sent to me as a sample for the purpose of reviewing here on The Finer Point. All the thoughts in this review are my own. When Tessa emailed to ask if I would like to test run her self produced Work Book I gladly agreed. As a lover of paper I have had fleeting thoughts about creating a notebook myself and I admire Tessa a lot for doing this. The Stationer Work Book is an A5 exercise (or composition) notebook. The cover has a thick paper stock in an off white and there is some beautiful risograph print on the front in lovely bold contrasting colours. The slight cross over of the colours on the ‘T’ may not be a design choice but I really like the look. I have the ruled notebook which I often prefer when I am journaling. The Work Book is hand stitched with threads of very similar colours to the riso print on the font cover. Finally the paper is recycled or FSC approved which is a nice touch. First impressions. Honestly I was surprised by the quality when I opened the package. The Work Book is sturdier than I had expected, the cover has a good weight (270gsm) to give it the feeling that it is in fact protecting the notebook and to give it a substantial feeling in hand. The second surprising element was that the printed grid lines weren't too dark. Past experience has taught me on smaller productions of notebooks this part of the notebook can be overlooked, but it’s often the more important part of the design. You want the grid to guide, not impose and the Work Book has just the right grey tone for its lines. Paper quality. I have tried a few different pens and pencils out on this paper to see how the mix of recycled and FSC stock held up. You can see the recycled elements in some of the pages, but the paper it smooth to the touch which means it handles different writing materials well. Fountain pens with varying thicknesses worked well. Even though the paper stock is 50% recycled material there was no feathering. Personally the ruled lines are a little too close together, but this is purely due to my big loopy writing. I prefer a notebook with a little extra space. Overall thoughts. This is a very nice notebook. I believe this is the second batch that The Stationer has produced and the signs are really promising. In some ways I think it’s like the Mark + Fold exercise book. Similar in size, strong paper stock and not too overdone. Tessa has created a simple, yet very well thought through notebook. Thank you to The Stationer for providing me with a sample of this notebook to review on the blog.

  • This webpage has 470 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 1 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: Journaling

Suggestion: Journalism
Suggestion: Journalist
Suggestion: Journal
Suggestion: Adjourning

Broken links:

  • This webpage has 18 broken links.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears NOT to be mobile friendly - this is NOT a good thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!