Page Title: Rail Geelong - VicRail Altona - Somerton pipeline

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description: Rail Geelong - hopefully everything you ever wanted to know about the history of the railways of Geelong and District, and then some.

  • This webpage makes use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: Victoria had 3 major oil refineries - they were opened in the following years: BP owned Westernport in 1966 (no longer operating) Altona PRA (65% Mobil / 35% Esso owned) in 1955 Shell Australia at Corio, Geelong in 1954 These refineries distributed two thirds of their product by rail. Filling and receiving terminals were all oil company controlled, and until the 1980s they objecting to despatching their product from other companies depots or in other companies tankers. The majority of oil tankers were company owned, the other 20% of tankers owned by VR and hired out. Scheduling of oil trains was also inefficient, being controlled by oil companies, resulting in low utilisation of rolling stock due to tankers being attached to ordinary goods trains. Most tankers are bottom unloading and top filling, to provide bottom loading would speed up operations and increase safety, but was expensive. Across Victoria there was a huge number of country oil terminals, with 190 depots in 65 cities and towns. 91 of these depots had no rail deliveries by the 1980s, but still received cheap rent from the railways. Only 89 of the depots were rail serviced in 38 towns, but 33 of these had less than one tanker delivered a week. Timeline November 1971: first talks on Somerton to Paisley pipeline with Mobil June 1972: Mobil proposed buying land at Somerton (40 acres) for distribution of oil by road and rail, was considering railing jet fuel from Altona to Somerton, then pipeline to Tullamarine. They wanted to transport 200k to 260k tons / year of fuel, and asked VR for the freight costs. They were quoted 30 cents / ton for 24 wagon trains, 35 cents / ton for 20 wagon trains. October 1972: BP and Shell had taken some interest in Somerton idea May 1973: first VR block fuel train ran to Wodonga October 1975: heads of agreement signed between VicRail, Shell, Mobil and Esso for pipeline 1976 - 1979: negotiations continue, with a May 1979 target May 1979 - February 1980: industrial matters prevent opening of pipeline November 1979: government introduces legislation to ban tankers for Tullamarine Freeway, planned to be gazetted in 1st quarter of 1980. Top Justification VicPipes (owned by VicRail) had a 25% interest in pipeline, the rest being the oil companies. Negotiations started in 1975, with the initial justification being the transport of jet fuel to the new airport at Tullamarine. Later plans were to convert line to multi-product operation, to allow allow city deliveries to the North and North East of Melbourne by road. Storage tanks at Somerton would permit rail loading for distribution into country Victoria and southern NSW, removing the need for road tankers to pass through Melbourne to access the oil company terminals in Spotswood, Williamstown and Altona. The attractiveness of the plan declined due to changed circumstances, with less market growth in northern Victoria and south NSW. The oil companies also feared of regulation on movement of bulk petroleum on highways, and were concerned the State Government was working to help VicRail through shaping / influencing transport policy. The oil industry unlikely to support investment at Somerton as being in best interest of industry. By company, their opinion towards the Somerton terminal: Shell wanted to supply north Victoria and southern NSW from Corio, by adding an extra white product pipeline from Corio to Spotswood, ties in with Somerton. The modifications for block train loading at Corio was costed at $250,000 for modifications. Believed Shell would support VR once plans clarified. BP doesn't want to improve Dandenong or Paisley terminals until the Somerton multi product plan is clear. Was worried about government policy, and ROI on pipeline. Believed that without the VR pipeline would not have gone ahead. A neutral / interested bystander. Mobil wants SG access for southern NSW access, does not want to spend money on Altona or Williamstown. Was the main co-ordinator on Somerton scheme, could follow VR but probably not actively promote as in early 1970s. Caltex is opposed to pipeline, wants Victorian refiners to send product via sea to Sydney for NSW distribution. Not actively support. Total will likely support scheme. Esso, Amoco, Ampol, Golden Fleece were of a waning market position and no real significance. Top VicRail five year plan In 1980 VicRail's five year plan was to introduce 11 wagon long block oil trains on trunk rail routes, the trains being filled as one consist at a city terminal. Only one product would be carried: super grade petrol, which was 50% to 60% of oil freight at the time. The trains would be sent to one of several destinations, where a VR operated discharge terminal and transit storage would be located. From here smaller pipelines would run to the oil company owned country terminals. The plan allowed the elimination of multiple filling and discharge points, made deliveries to customers more regular, and allowed the retirement of a poor quality tanker fleet. There would be more than enough tank cars for the scheme, with ten TWX and eleven TWF coded tankers to be dehired from oil companies, plus eleven TWF tankers would be freed up from the current Wodonga block train. Top City loading terminal Oil companies claimed Somerton multi product terminal (phase 2 of pipeline scheme) would cost $30 to 35 million. VR said that a rail only terminal would cost $2.9 only million, with both broad and standard gauges. Two sites were considered for the terminal, Tottenham and Somerton. Tottenham pros: supplied with product by an off take from the 14 inch diameter Somerton pipeline. plenty of open space in the area 9000 m3 transit tank bottom filling connections at 4 points 11 wagons filled in 2 1/4 hours, with 2 man crew provision for 6 tank loading positions Tottenham cons: issues with multi product need to pay for usage of pipeline all the way to Somerton (as they would be taking up capacity of the pipeline from the 'feed' end) extra cost for rail movements, but more destinations convenient rail staff are already located nearby The Somerton terminal would have been on the eastern side of the North East Railway, just south of the Melbourne oil terminals (operated Shell / Mobil / Esso / BP) but the area was too small. Top Country terminals Ten country terminals would be established to be the destinations of block trains, each would then distribute petroleum by short distance pipelines to oil company terminals, or fill up road tankers. Mildura

  • This webpage has 1033 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 6 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: Westernport

Suggestion: Western port
Suggestion: Western-port
Suggestion: Westernmost
Suggestion: Northwestern
Suggestion: Westerner
Suggestion: Northwester

Possibly mis-spelt word: Altona

Suggestion: Alton
Suggestion: Alton a
Suggestion: Atonal
Suggestion: Walton
Suggestion: Salton
Suggestion: Dalton
Suggestion: Tonal

Possibly mis-spelt word: PRA

Suggestion: PREY
Suggestion: PAR
Suggestion: PEA
Suggestion: PR
Suggestion: PA
Suggestion: PARA
Suggestion: PRAT
Suggestion: PRAM
Suggestion: PRAY
Suggestion: RAP
Suggestion: ERA
Suggestion: PRO
Suggestion: BRA
Suggestion: PRY
Suggestion: IRA

Possibly mis-spelt word: Esso

Suggestion: Es so
Suggestion: Es-so
Suggestion: SOSes

Possibly mis-spelt word: Corio

Suggestion: Curio
Suggestion: Coriolis

Possibly mis-spelt word: Geelong

Suggestion: Gee long
Suggestion: Gee-long
Suggestion: Erelong
Suggestion: Belong
Suggestion: Longer
Suggestion: Angelo

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • It appears that this page was updated on the Monday, March 7, 2022 which is NOT within the last thirty days - this is NOT a good thing!

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears to be mobile friendly - this is a GOOD thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!