Page Title: I made a terrible battle card game | Mike Laraman

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description: Sort of like Top Trumps, except crap and nonsensical.

  • This webpage makes use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: I made a terrible battle card game 13th June 2021 Now, before you say anything, I know you were waiting on tenterhooks for the day that somebody would make a shit knockoff version of Top Trumps . Don’t worry - that day is finally here. It’s currently pretty rough - right now the game exists as just a deck of handmade cards with quick fineliner illustrations. I’ve had a lot of silly fun coming up with cards to include so far and I’m planning to add a bunch more in time. But what’s the story here, you might ask? Well, as it turns out, this (as yet untitled) game isn’t exactly like Top Trumps For anyone who doesn’t know how Top Trumps goes, here’s a quick rundown. Top Trumps decks are always focused around a singular theme ( Star Wars , sharks, cats, etc) and generally include 30 to 50 or so cards full of statistics. Players are dealt equal numbers of cards each and then they compare the stats on them in a series of ‘battles’ (eg. “My Spider-man card has got a Power rating of 45!” “My Hulk card has got a Power of 40!”) to see who has the best score - at which point the victor adds the opponent(s)’ cards to their own pile and play continues. An example of an actual legit Top Trumps card (from the Marvel Comics pack). This goes on until every player but one has run out of cards, at which point a winner has emerged (unless, of course, everybody has gotten bored already and wandered off to do something else). So how does my version deviate from this formula? Well, whereas in Top Trumps the categories of statistics are always consistent from card to card within each themed deck, I wanted to make a daft version where all of the categories are completely different and don’t make any sense. Each of my card’s statistics are designated with one of four symbols (★ Star, △ Triangle, ◯ Circle, or ♦ Diamond). My hope was that this consistent pattern would allow for the comparison of otherwise wildly different statistics scored out of 100. Thus, each round would see you (for example) comparing your ★ Star value or your △ Triangle value to your opponent’s score, and only discovering later what the actual attributes were that you were competing on (perhaps learning that your Beefshark’s “Swole” score of 100 utterly trounced your opponent’s Battle Bottle due to them having a “Trousers” rating of 0). My partner and I have played the game a few times already, and it’s pretty fun! The category symbols worked as expected and we had a reasonably entertaining time. We did, however, run into a bit of an issue in that every time we played, we’d always seem to have roughly the same numbers of cards in our hands even after multiple rounds, and it was seemingly quite hard for anybody to ever gain a significant lead over the other, let alone actually win (the games had a tendency to basically just keep going forever). I can only assume this was due to a balance issue with the cards, and I have no idea how the makers of actual Top Trumps avoid this. I will need to think about it. One other thing I envisaged was that the finished game - if I decided to go all the way and turn it into a proper Thing - would ideally have a very large selection of cards (like, hundreds), and then the act of sitting down to play a game would entail dealing out only a small portion of them to each participant (a dozen each, or something). This would hopefully mean that every game would have a different feel as you would get a different roster of silly characters each time. Anyway, that’s my stupid card game. I might handmake a load more cards yet, and if I can sort out the game balance I might at some point work up the cards as a proper printed thing that looks a bit nicer - or not. For now, it’s just a whimsical little thing I made to experiment with the question of what would happen if you tried to do a version of Top Trumps where all the statistics were just incoherent nonsense. It’s a dirty job, but someone’s got to do it. ▸ More stuff to read...

  • This webpage has 703 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has no spelling errors that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has 10 images that do not have their width and height specified.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears to be mobile friendly - this is a GOOD thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!