Page Title: SBG Level Retakes for WL Input Assessments | La Clase de la Señora Dentlinger

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description: I've had some people ask me what I do when it comes to reassessing the leveled model  I use for SBG WL Input Assessments I shared a little while ago.  This post is dedicated to sharing what I do if a students fails their listening or reading assessment and needs to retake one of them. My…

  • This webpage makes use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: By Elizabeth Dentlinger I’ve had some people ask me what I do when it comes to reassessing the leveled model  I use for SBG WL Input Assessments I shared a little while ago .  This post is dedicated to sharing what I do if a students fails their listening or reading assessment and needs to retake one of them. My first tip is to make two versions of the test from the get go.  I do this because I don’t have desks and eyes wander so I need two versions to give out on the day of the test, and also because it makes retake time so much less work for me.  On my tests the information covered in the level 2 + 3 questions are the exact same on the two tests, but asked differently.  For example, the first level 2 question (which is a T/F sentence) on Test A will be the first open ended question in level 3 on Test B, and vice versa.  For listening, I type up another script and have questions ready to go when I type up the original. because my kids will share their answers and ask about the story they listened to. Next, decide if you feel kids should have to put in some work to reassess.  My first semester I did not have time to deal with creating extra resources (as I was preparing for maternity leave) so I just let students reassess.  This only applied to three kids before I went on maternity leave.  Since my return, I’ve had five students who continuously need to reassess and some who are just lazy or need to reread directions before working. To reassess reading standards at first I asked all students to translate the chapters covered on the test into English (which can be a LOT!).  I like that it made kids work for the retake, I like that it helped them understand the story better, and I liked that it didn’t take extra effort on my part.  However, it wasn’t sitting well with me that students could just retake (basically) the same test.  So now when a student fails a reading assessment they are provided a different version that has ten Level 2 statements and eight Level 3 (open ended) questions.  Students can choose if they want a Level 2 or Level 3, but they cannot go for a Level 4.  I ask students to take the test without notes in front of me and without a book (much like the first test they took) and they turn it in when done.  I then highlight all their incorrect answers and one correct one (which I make a mental note of) and they have to find one line from the book that supports their answer. I tell them it’s ok if some of their answers change.  I like that there’s more effort required and that it gets students back into the novel to support/defend their answer.  However, I don’t like that it means I’m creating a third test. To reassess listening standards my students now have to listen to two different stories on Edpuzzle  that use vocabulary we’ve worked on.  They answer the questions and have to answer 80% correct before they can reassess.  I then have a new story typed up with questions ready to go. Still have questions?  Visit my original post to see if I answered it already!

  • This webpage has 561 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 1 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: Dentlinger

Suggestion: Dent linger
Suggestion: Dent-linger
Suggestion: Derringer
Suggestion: Lingering
Suggestion: Lingerer
Suggestion: Interlining

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears to be mobile friendly - this is a GOOD thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has 1 links that do not contain anchor text - this is NOT a good thing.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!