Page Title: AV Peer Review Ratings & Client Review Awards | Martindale-Hubbell®

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description: Martindale-Hubbell's AV Preeminent Peer Review Rating has been used to recognize lawyers for their legal ability and ethical standards for over 100 years.

  • This webpage makes use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: Close × Martindale-Hubbell Attorney Peer Ratings and Client Reviews For more than 130 years, Martindale-Hubbell has been evaluating attorneys for their strong legal ability and high ethical standards through a Peer Review Rating system. Prior to the 1887 edition of Martindale’s American Law Directory, which was the first publication to provide such ratings to attorneys, there was no way of truly knowing if the lawyer you were considering to do business with was trustworthy, ethical, or skilled in the legal field. Today - Martindale-Hubbell continues to provide verified ratings for attorneys based not only on their legal ability and ethical standards as judged by their peers, but also based on reviews from their clients. While the criteria and format of the Peer Review Rating system has evolved since the 1800’s - the goal of Martindale-Hubbell ratings remains the same: to help keep the public informed when making the decision to do business with an attorney or law firm. Martindale-Hubbell Peer Review Ratings AV Preeminent, Distinguished and Notable Peer Review Rating Awards AV Preeminent Ratings recognize lawyers with the highest level of professional excellence Distinguished Ratings recognize experienced and respected attorneys Notable Ratings recognize lawyers for their ethical standards Historically the Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ system utilized an “A - B - C” scale to estimate the legal ability and ethical standards of an attorney. To qualify for an “A” rating an attorney had to be reported as “Very High” in their legal ability and had been practicing for at least 10 years, a “B” rating meant an attorney was rated “High” and had to be practicing for at least 5 years, and a “C” rating meant that the attorney was rated “fair” with no limitations on how long they were practicing. A second rating was also given to go along with the “A - B - C” rating and that was a “V,” meaning that the attorney's peers stated they had "Very High" ethical standards. Over the years this transitioned to “AV”, “BV”, and “CV” ratings - with an “AV” rating meaning that the attorney had reached the highest of professional excellence and is recognized for the highest levels of skill and integrity. Today, Martindale-Hubbell conducts a thorough review of attorneys who wish to receive a Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™, through a secure online peer review survey where a lawyer’s ethical standards and legal ability in a specific area of practice is assessed by their peers. Once the review process is completed an attorney may receive 1 of the following Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™: AV Preeminent®: The highest peer rating standard. This is given to attorneys who are ranked at the highest level of professional excellence for their legal expertise, communication skills, and ethical standards by their peers. Distinguished: An excellent rating for an attorney who has some experience and is widely respected by their peers for their professional achievement and ethical standards. Notable: A rating given to a lawyer who has been recognized by a large number of their peers for their strong ethical standards The information of which our ratings are based has been procured at great expense by a system of our own; not relying on any one source, but verifying through several mediums J.B. Martindale 1896 Founder of the Martindale-Hubbell Law Directory Martindale-Hubbell Client Review Ratings Client Review Rating Awards Platinum Client Champions have at least 10 reviews, with an average score of 4.5 or higher Gold Client Champions have at least 6 reviews, with an average score of 4.2 or higher Silver Client Champions have at least 3 reviews, with an average score of 4.0 or higher Client Reviewed is a badge to indicate that the attorney has at least one client review While the Peer Review Ratings™ is still the gold standard in attorney ratings - times have most certainly changed since the first attorney ratings were released in 1887. With the rise of the internet and how easy it is to share your experience with a business - it was important that Martindale-Hubbell also introduced a rating system for client reviews. In 2017 Martindale-Hubbell introduced a yearly client review rating award known as the “Client Champion” award to help consumers understand the real world experience previous clients had with a lawyer or law firm. Attorneys can qualify for 3 different award levels of “Client Champion” based on client reviews: Platinum: Has received at least 10 client reviews and maintains and average client rating of 4.5 or higher. Gold: Has received at least 6 client reviews and maintains and average client rating of 4.2 or higher. Silver: Has received at least 3 client reviews and maintains and average client rating of 4.0 or higher. Client Reviewed: At least one client review. Whether you’re a consumer who is looking to enlist the services of an attorney or a lawyer interested in being awarded a Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Rating™ or Client Champion rating - Martindale-Hubbell has all the information you need; just select your path below.

  • This webpage has 801 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has no spelling errors that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken links:

  • This webpage has 12 broken links.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has 12 broken image links.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has 10 images that do not have their width and height specified.

Mobile friendly:

  • >After testing this webpage we were unable to determine if this page is mobile friendly.

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!