Page Title:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the TITLE meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: directed by Jimmy Chin and Elizabeth Chai Vasarhelyi 128 minutes, rated TV-MA streaming on Netflix Last Friday, a Falcon 9 lifted off from the Kennedy Space Center and placed into orbit a Crew Dragon spacecraft called Endeavour. The spacecraft docked to the International Space Station less than 24 hours later, delivering four private astronauts on the Ax-1 mission for Axiom Space. Shortly after Endeavour returns from its ten-day mission, another Crew Dragon, named Freedom, will launch on the Crew-4 mission for NASA, delivering American and European astronauts for a five-month stay. “He’s a human just like the rest of us,” Hurley saus of Musk. “We all have pluses and minuses.” Ax-1 and Crew-4 will be the sixth and seventh crewed missions launched by SpaceX in less than two years. That streak started with the launch of Demo-2 in May 2020, carrying NASA astronauts Bob Behnken and Doug Hurley on Endeavour to the ISS on the first crewed orbital flight from the US since the retirement of the Space Shuttle nearly nine years earlier. That flight is the subject of a new documentary, Return to Space, that premiered on Netflix last week. The documentary, done in cooperation with NASA and SpaceX, takes viewers inside the preparations for flight, the launch itself, and through splashdown. That includes interviews with Behnken and Hurley, as well as SpaceX’s Elon Musk, Gwynne Shotwell, and Hans Koenigsmann, and then-NASA administrator Jim Bridenstine. Lori Garver, deputy administrator of NASA at the time the commercial crew program started, appears to discuss the origins of the program and the political opposition to it a decade ago. There are no great revelations in the documentary, at least for those who followed the commercial crew program for years. The value is more in the views behind the scenes during preparations for the flight. Musk, in the launch control center during the first launch attempt that was scrubbed by weather, is frustrated and asks if the weather information that led to the scrub was up to date. In another, Bridenstine watches as NASA and SpaceX personnel rehearse NASA TV coverage for the launch, including what they would do if there was an anomaly on the pad (stay with a wide shot of the pad, a NASA official says, and not cutaway as a SpaceX person suggests.) There is also some interesting archival footage, such as rarely seen views of the first three failed Falcon 1 launches, illustrating the company’s willingness to embrace failure. “The great thing about Elon is that he understands failure is part of the development,” Koenigsmann says. While Return to Space is billed as an inspiring documentary, it runs out of steam about two-thirds of the way through. Notably, the film shies away from any controversies beyond the origins of the commercial crew program itself. Musk’s infamous tweets, and his joint-smoking incident on Joe Rogan’s podcast, get brief mentions before the film moves on. (“He’s a human just like the rest of us,” says Hurley. “We all have pluses and minuses.”) While the launch turned into a political spectacle, with both President Trump and Vice President Pence attending and Trump giving a speech in the Vehicle Assembly Building after liftoff, it never comes up in the movie: we see only a fleeting glimpse of Pence and nothing of Trump. While Return to Space is billed as an inspiring documentary, it runs out of steam about two-thirds of the way through. After the successful launch of Demo-2 and docking with the station, the film covers their two months on the ISS, including a spacewalk by Behnken and Chris Cassidy. But these activities are no different from those astronauts have performed on the station for two decades, and the drama building up to the launch has dissipated. Only when it’s time to return home, with the nail-biting in mission control as Musk and others await restoration of communications and deployment of the parachutes, does that drama return. With a regular cadence of NASA and commercial Crew Dragon missions now, it’s easy to see then as commonplace, something that SpaceX officials reject. “This is not routine,” Benji Reed, SpaceX’s senior director for human spaceflight programs, said in a call with reporters after the launch of Ax-1 Friday, seeking to ward off any thoughts of complacency. The cadence of Crew Dragon missions is still far short of the shuttle at its peak, but it has restored a capability that was lost for nearly a decade. Return to Space celebrates that achievement. Jeff Foust ( jeff@thespacereview.com ) is the editor and publisher of The Space Review, and a senior staff writer with SpaceNews . He also operates the Spacetoday.net web site. Views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author alone. Note: we are using a new commenting system, which may require you to create a new account.

  • This webpage has 794 words which is between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words - GOOD WORK.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are using header tags - this is a GOOD thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 3 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: Chai

Suggestion: Chi
Suggestion: Chan
Suggestion: Chad
Suggestion: Thai
Suggestion: Chain
Suggestion: Chair
Suggestion: Char
Suggestion: Chat
Suggestion: Chap
Suggestion: Chaise

Possibly mis-spelt word: Vasarhelyi

Possibly mis-spelt word: Endeavour

Suggestion: Endeavor
Suggestion: Rendezvous

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • It appears that this page uses DIVs for layout this is a GOOD thing!

Last modified date:

  • We were unable to detect what date this page was last modified

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears NOT to be mobile friendly - this is NOT a good thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!