Page Title: LILEKS (James) The Peculiar Art of Mr. Frahm

  • This webpage makes use of the TITLE meta tag - this is good for search engine optimization.

Page Description:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the DESCRIPTION meta tag - this is NOT GOOD for search engine optimization.

Page Keywords:

  • This webpage DOES NOT make use of the KEYWORDS meta tag - whilst search engines nowadays do not put too much emphasis on this meta tag including them in your website does no harm.

Page Text: It is unfair to judge Art Frahm by these illustrations. He did many that were much, much worse. (And better, too.) But the falling-panty theme is a staple of his work. This was his signature touch. When I first put up the site a million years ago, I thought it was ridiculous - underwear with elastic bands just didn’t slip down. It’s like a series of paintings in which bras spontaneously combust. Since then I’ve heard from women of the era say yes oh my yes. It happened. But did it happen like this? Arms full, wind blowing up the skirt, some leering guys in the background? No. This is a glimpse into someone's fantasy - a world where men regularly happen across women whose undergarments have fluttered to their ankles. A world where underwear failure in the middle of an everyday chore is a signal, a cue, an invitation. Her pants are down and she can't run. Have at it, boys! Herewith are a selection of Frahm’s works, resized and rewritten for 2013, with additional examples of the “Falling Panties” school and some completely unexpected appearances of Art’s art.

  • This webpage has 189 words which is NOT between the recommended minimum of 250 words and the recommended maximum of 2500 words.

Header tags:

  • It appears that you are NOT using header tags - this is a NOT a good thing!

Spelling errors:

  • This webpage has 1 words which may be misspelt.

Possibly mis-spelt word: Frahm

Suggestion: Brahma

Broken links:

  • This webpage has no broken links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

Broken image links:

  • This webpage has no broken image links that we can detect - GOOD WORK.

CSS over tables for layout?:

  • This webpage looks like it may use Tables for layout - this is NOT recommended.

Last modified date:

  • It appears that this page was updated on the Monday, December 23, 2013 which is NOT within the last thirty days - this is NOT a good thing!

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are being re-sized by the browser - GOOD WORK.

Images that are being re-sized:

  • This webpage has no images that are missing their width and height - GOOD WORK.

Mobile friendly:

  • After testing this webpage it appears NOT to be mobile friendly - this is NOT a good thing!

Links with no anchor text:

  • This webpage has no links that are missing anchor text - GOOD WORK.

W3C Validation:

Print friendly?:

  • It appears that the webpage does NOT use CSS stylesheets to provide print functionality - this is a BAD thing.

GZIP Compression enabled?:

  • It appears that the serrver does NOT have GZIP Compression enabled - this is a NOT a good thing!