Page Text: Trudeau Declares War on Free Press Rebel News, Leftists Continue Whining About Warm Weather
Down-ranking everyone is done in the US by our ‘internet’ bosses who hate anyone who isn’t a communist operative. $61 million Canadian dollars were given to ‘mainstream news’ by Trudeau just one month before his election! This is called ‘bribes’ normally. The level of corruption in Canada is worse than the US at this point and at the US it is very high! The Bilderberg gang hates real news operations. They destroyed CNN by offering Ted Turner lots of money to go away and let them ruin CNN. Now, nearly no one wants CNN and it is collapsing. People are rapidly getting fed up with the leftist/Bilderberg agendas!
… ja häikäilemättömiä sotarikoksia muita kansoja vastaan, pitäisi olla vahvin mahdollinen lisäkannustin nopeuttaa kaikkia tarpeellisia päätöksiä! @TyttiTup @TimoHarakka @MarinSanna #SlavaUkrayini pic.twitter.com/StZSkJqxxt
— Elokapina – Extinction Rebellion Finland (@elokapina) April 12, 2022
The young Europeans in Finland have no idea what lies in wait for them all. Once they end up with near zero coal/wood/oil to ‘save the earth from being warm’ they will get their wishes granted by the demonic Furies who always give people what they wish for…fatally. Finland is ‘warm’ right now due to this being still an interglacial era.
Left-Wing Labour Party Comes Out Against Eco-Warrior Oil Blockades Amid Fuel Shortages, Cost of Living Crisis https://t.co/p8AaI03DAv
— Breitbart London (@BreitbartLondon) April 12, 2022
England is already alarmed enough so that even ‘liberals’ don’t want to shut down all energy systems now. All of Europe is being shoved violently into fighting over limited energy solutions that will lead to most people living without basic heat/food situations especially in winters.
The New York Times is dying like CNN. Extremely liberal and very insane, the people there think there is this super warm weather which seems to elude regular people (the massive blizzard today, for example, isn’t ‘news’ there) and here is an editorial interview with a crazy lady who hates Trump and is part of the cabal who constantly say ‘Putin…Trump’ in the same sentence all the time because they can’t stop lying nonstop. Poor dears.
Fiona Hill vividly recalls the first time she stepped into the Oval Office to discuss the thorny subject of Ukraine with the president. It was February of 2008, the last year of George W. Bush’s administration. Hill, then the national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia for the National Intelligence Council, was summoned for a strategy session on the upcoming NATO summit in Bucharest, Romania. Among the matters up for discussion was the possibility of Ukraine and another former Soviet state, Georgia, beginning the process of obtaining NATO membership.
Want to start WWIII? Bring all of the former Soviet States into NATO. This is why Bush and others told Russia, we would never do this. Then, the neocons in the US, the Bilderberg gang, did this. Russia was furious and was told to drop dead. I am smarter than these people and I knew this would happen back then. And it continues to happen today.
In the Oval Office, Hill recalls, describing a scene that has not been previously reported, she told Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney that offering a membership path to Ukraine and Georgia could be problematic. While Bush’s appetite for promoting the spread of democracy had not been dampened by the Iraq war, President Vladimir Putin of Russia viewed NATO with suspicion and was vehemently opposed to neighboring countries joining its ranks. He would regard it as a provocation, which was one reason the United States’ key NATO allies opposed the idea. Cheney took umbrage at Hill’s assessment. “So, you’re telling me you’re opposed to freedom and democracy,” she says he snapped. According to Hill, he abruptly gathered his materials and walked out of the Oval Office.
And Hill was right! So read what happens next:
“He’s just yanking your chain,” she remembers Bush telling her. “Go on with what you were saying.” But the president seemed confident that he could win over the other NATO leaders, saying, “I like it when diplomacy is tough.” Ignoring the advice of Hill and the U.S. intelligence community, Bush announced in Bucharest that “NATO should welcome Georgia and Ukraine into the Membership Action Plan.” Hill’s prediction came true: Several other leaders at the summit objected to Bush’s recommendation. NATO ultimately issued a compromise declaration that would prove unsatisfying to nearly everyone, stating that the two countries “will become members” without specifying how and when they would do so — and still in defiance of Putin’s wishes. (They still have not become members.)
Hill would stay on in the same role in the Obama administration for close to a year. Obama’s handling of Putin did not always strike her as judicious. When Chuck Todd of NBC asked Obama at a news conference in 2013 about his working relationship with Putin, Obama replied, “He’s got that kind of slouch, looking like the bored kid in the back of the classroom.” Hill told me that she “winced” when she heard his remark, and when Obama responded to Putin’s invasion and annexation of the Ukrainian region Crimea a year later by referring to Russia as “a regional power that is threatening some of its immediate neighbors, not out of strength but out of weakness,” she winced again. “We said openly, ‘Don’t dis the guy — he’s thin-skinned and quick to take insults,’” Hill said of this counsel to Obama about Putin. “He either didn’t understand the man or willfully ignored the advice.”
It seems everyone ignores this ‘expert’.
Looking back on the Trump years, Hill has slowly come to recognize the unsettling significance in disparate incidents and episodes that she did not have the arm’s-length view to appreciate in the moment. During our lunch, we discussed what it was like for her and others to have worked for Trump after having done the same for George W. Bush and Barack Obama. Her meeting in the Bush White House in 2008, Hill told me, offered a sharp contrast to the briefings she sat in on during her tumultuous two years of service in the Trump administration. Unlike Trump, President Bush had read his briefing materials. His questions were respectful. She offered him an unpopular opinion and was not punished or frozen out for it. Even the vice president’s dyspeptic behavior that day did not unnerve her, she told me. “His emphasis was on the power of the executive branch,” she said. “It wasn’t on the unchecked power of one executive. And it was never to overturn the Constitution.”
When did Trump ‘overturn the Constitution’? What? He ignored her because everyone ignored her according to her own stories so what made Trump worse??? He actually did many great things despite NATO and US liberals screaming like monkeys nonstop. His big thing was to force our nasty NATO ‘allies’ to pay up for their own protection instead of forcing US taxpayers paying nearly 100% of the overhead costs for NATO. This female didn’t do this, Trump did this!
This is why, as I have said in the past, the EU ‘leaders’ hated Trump. Putin respected Trump, even feared him. China was in hysterics as Trump twisted their arms, hard. North Korea made nice to Trump. He was the best ‘foreign affairs’ President in my entire life. I am amazed and happy with him and wish he was President but we are stuck with a lunatic who is brain dead, instead.
Share this: